But how did Fauci respond to those positions that dared to contradicted his own? He dismissed them as anti-science. Those same lockdowns are considered by various scientists, like British infectious disease expert Mark Woolhouse, to have done more harm than good. Except that people were actually arguing in favor of keeping schools open, and against the kind of lockdowns that Fauci himself claimed saved lives when he appeared on former CNN host Chris Cuomo’s show. Except that he didn’t fight to keep them open despite now acknowledging that closures led to “deleterious collateral consequences.” He said that he had nothing to do with that, that it was a political decision. So much for wrapping grandma’s hosiery around your face and thinking that you’re safe from viral contamination.įauci argues that he never closed a school. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - is on a public relations tour, shoring up his legacy and moderating the various positions that he previously promoted.įauci went on TV amid the pandemic to peddle the idea that people make themselves cloth masks, and now says in a new interview with the New York Times that “masks work at the margins, maybe 10 percent”, with the exception, he says, of N95 or KN95 masks. Anthony Fauci, now retired from his position as the highest paid civil servant in America - the head of the U.S. What’s the deal with the recent self-serving Covid-era revisionism by Western officials?ĭr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |